CSE · GS-2Official PYQ · CSE 2020 · Q12Polity · Separation of Powers · 15 marks · 250 words
English
Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.
हिन्दी
न्यायिक विधायन, भारतीय संविधान में परिकल्पित शक्ति पृथक्करण सिद्धान्त का प्रतिपक्षी है। इस संदर्भ में कार्यपालक अधिकरणों को दिशा-निर्देश देने की प्रार्थना करने सम्बन्धी, बड़ी संख्या में दायर होने वाली, लोक हित याचिकाओं का न्याय औचित्य सिद्ध कीजिये।
Text taken verbatim from the commission's published question paper. Transcribed from UPSC’s question paper, CS(M) 2020 (English and Hindi). Source
Syllabus
Polity · Separation of Powers
Separation of powers between various organs, dispute redressal mechanisms and institutions.
CSE syllabus →Full CSE 2020 GS-2 paper →More on #Parliament & Legislatures →More on #Judiciary →More on #Judicial Review & Activism →
Similar previous year questions
- Do you think that Constitution of India does not accept principle of strict separation of powers rather it is based on the principle of ‘checks and balance’? Explain.CSE 2019 · GS-2
- Constitutional Democracy is based on the principle of separation of power. Elucidate.GPSC 2022-23 · GS-2
- Explain the reasons for the growth of public interest litigation in India. As a result of it, has the Indian Supreme Court emerged as the world’s most powerful judiciary?CSE 2024 · GS-2
- Starting from inventing the ‘basic structure’ doctrine, the judiciary has played a highly proactive role in ensuring that India develops into a thriving democracy. In light of the statement, evaluate the role played b…CSE 2014 · GS-2
- ‘The Supreme Court of India keeps a check on arbitrary power of the Parliament in amending the Constitution.’ Discuss critically.CSE 2013 · GS-2
Added by @upsc2ias